About
How We Report
Since 2013, Alamos has published an annual ESG Report to document the management and outcomes of our sustainability initiatives across our operating mines, projects, and offices. While this report focuses on these operations, it includes information relevant to all Alamos subsidiaries. For a comprehensive overview of our organisational structure, please refer to our Annual Information Form.
Due to variations in calculation methodologies, some figures in this ESG Report may differ from those presented in other Alamos disclosures, such as our consolidated financial reports. While our ESG Reports are not externally assured, they undergo a rigorous internal review process by management and committees that include Alamos executives for accuracy, consistency, and credibility.
Alamos’ 2025 reporting year (January 1 – December 31, 2025) included the sale of two assets: the Quartz Mountain Project and the Turkish subsidiary which owns the Turkish Development Projects. As a result, these assets are no longer represented in the ESG Report. In addition, 2025 marks the first year that Alamos reports a full calendar year of data related to the Magino Mine; therefore, year-on-year comparisons of certain quantitative metrics may reflect more pronounced variances. Finally, most information related to the Magino and Island Gold Mines is now reported under the consolidated Island Gold District.
Alamos is committed to continuously improving the accuracy, precision, and governance of its sustainability data in alignment with industry leading practices. As a result, calculation methodologies and the scope of various metrics may evolve over time. When data summation methods are updated, the revised methodology may be applied to previous years’ data, with clear notice of any restatements.
Transparency remains a priority, and Alamos continues to disclose its calculation methods and sources while adhering to leading industry frameworks for consistency and comparability. This ESG Report has been prepared in alignment with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards including the Sector Standard for Mining, the Metals and Mining Standard of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the recommendations of the Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). Unless otherwise stated, financial figures are reported in U.S. dollars.
Users can refer to the GRI Index, SASB Index, and TCFD Index to locate specific disclosures within this report and the accompanying Data Tables.
Materiality Assessment
The ESG landscape continues to evolve alongside social, cultural, political and regulatory dynamics. To ensure consistency, relevance, and transparency across our annual ESG programs and disclosures amid this change, Alamos is guided by the results of our double materiality assessment (DMA).
A DMA evaluates the relevance of ESG topics to a company’s business by considering both (i) the company’s actual and potential impacts on the environment and society (impact materiality), and (ii) the financial risks and opportunities those topics may present to the business (financial materiality). Alamos completed the first iteration of its DMA through two distinct but complimentary phases.
Impact Assessment
The impact assessment component was conducted in 2023. Alamos partnered with an independent consultancy to assess the environmental and social impacts of the Young-Davidson, Island Gold, and Mulatos mines across 60 sustainability topics identified by the Embedding Project. The assessment incorporated document reviews, stakeholder interviews, and workshops involving both Alamos staff and local community members. While the Magino mine was not included in this initial assessment, Alamos intends to incorporate Magino into a future update and to refresh the impact assessment on a routine basis going forward. Given the Magino and Island Gold mines’ shared operating context and physical proximity within the same local community, meaningful alignment with the existing Island Gold results is anticipated.
Financial Assessment
The financial assessment was subsequently conducted in 2024. Using the same set of sustainability performance areas, Alamos again engaged a third-party to identify risks and opportunities associated with each topic and to evaluate the potential financial impacts of risk realisation. This process incorporated considerations of operational and reputational implications, as well as market and investor expectations. Quantitative materiality thresholds were aligned with Alamos’ enterprise risk matrix.
The quantitative results of the impact and financial assessments were normalised and mapped to determine whether topics were impact material, financially material, or both (Figure 1.1). These findings inform the structure and focus of this ESG Report. By prioritising topics that are most relevant to our operations and stakeholders, Alamos seeks to deliver meaningful, decision-useful sustainability information that remains robust amid an evolving ESG landscape.
Figure 1.1
Double Materiality Assessment Results
Quadrant Legend
-
Double Material Topics assessed above the threshold for both financial materiality (i.e., potential to affect Alamos’ financial performance) and impact materiality (i.e., Alamos’ potential to cause significant social or environmental impacts).
-
Financially Material, Impact Immaterial Topics assessed above the threshold for financial materiality, but below the threshold for impact materiality.
-
Impact Material, Financially Immaterial Topics assessed above the threshold for impact materiality, but below the threshold for financial materiality.
-
Double Immaterial (Not shown in graphic) Topics assessed below the threshold for both financial and impact materiality. These topics have been excluded from the visual representation.
Scroll horizontally to view the full chart
To meet the needs of ESG Report users, Alamos provides both curated ESG content and raw data. While our ESG Report complies with the GRI, SASB and TCFD recommendations, the depth of coverage for each sustainability topic has been strategically determined by our Materiality Assessment. Data points required by these frameworks but deemed less relevant to Alamos’ operations and stakeholders are included in the Data Tables, with direct links provided in the following GRI, SASB, and TCFD indices.
GRI Index
| GRI Indicator | Disclosure Requirement | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| General Disclosures | ||
| 2-1: Organizational details | a) Legal name | Home > The Company |
| b) Nature of ownership and legal form | Home > The Company | |
| c) Location of headquarters | Home > The Company | |
| d) Countries of operation | Home > The Company | |
| 2-2: Entities included in the organization’s sustainability reporting | a) Entities included in sustainability reporting | About > How We Report |
| b) Differences between entities included in financial reporting and sustainability reporting, if any | About > How We Report | |
| c) Approach for consolidating information across entities | About > How We Report | |
| 2-3: Reporting period, frequency, and contact point | a) Reporting period and frequency of sustainability reporting | About > How We Report |
| b) Reporting period for financial reporting | About > How We Report | |
| c) Publication date | November 4th, 2026 | |
| d) Contact point for questions about sustainability reporting | Contact Us | |
| 2-4: Restatements of information | a) Reasons for restatements made from previous reporting periods | About > How We Report |
|
2-5: External assurance |
a) Policy and practice for seeking external assurance, and involvement of highest governance body and senior executives | About > How We Report |
| b) Whether sustainability reporting has been externally assured | About > How We Report | |
| 2-6: Activities, value chain and other business relationships | a) Business sector in which the organization is active | Home > The Company |
| b) Supply chain, activities, products, services, and markets served | Governance > Stakeholder Management | |
| c) Relevant business relationships | Governance > Stakeholder Management | |
| d) Significant changes in value chain and business activities compared to previous reporting period | About > How We Report | |
| 2-7: Employees | a) Total employees by gender and region |
Our People > Workforce > Table 3.1 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 13-31 |
| b) Permanent, temporary, non-guaranteed hours, full-time, and part-time employees by gender and region |
Our People > Workforce > Table 3.1 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 42-125 |
|
| c) Methodologies used to compile data | Our People > Workforce > Table 3.1 | |
| d) Necessary contextual information | Our People > Workforce > Table 3.1 | |
| e) Description of significant fluctuations in employees | Our People > Workforce > Table 3.2 | |
| 2-8: Workers who are not employees | a) Total number of workers who are not employees |
Our People > Workforce > Table 3.1 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 33-39 |
| b) Methodologies used to compile data | Our People > Workforce > Table 3.1 | |
| c) Description of significant fluctuations in workers who are not employees | Our People > Workforce > Table 3.2 | |
| 2-9: Governance structure and composition | a) Description of governance structure and committees of the highest governance body | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure |
| b) List of committees responsible for decision-making and management of impacts on the economy, environment, and people | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure | |
| c) Composition of the highest governance body | Governance > Governance Approach > Table 2.1 | |
| 2-10: Nomination and selection of the highest governance body | a) Nomination and selection process for the highest governance body and its committees | Management Information Circular |
| b) Criteria used for nomination and selection | Management Information Circular | |
| 2-11: Chair of the highest governance body | a) Whether the chair of the highest governance body is also a senior executive in the organization | Governance > Business Ethics > Conflicts of Interest |
| b) If the chair is also a senior executive, their function in management and reason for this arrangement | n/a | |
| 2-12: Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of impacts | a) Role of the highest governance body and senior executives in developing and approving values, strategies, policies, and goals related to sustainable development | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure |
| b) Role of the highest governance body in overseeing due diligence processes to manage impacts on the economy, environment, and people | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure | |
| c) Role of the highest governance body in reviewing the effectiveness of sustainability-related processes | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure | |
| 2-13: Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts | a) How the highest governance body delegates responsibility for management impacts to the economy, environment, and people | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure |
| b) Process and frequency for senior executives and other employees to report to the highest governance body on the management of impacts to the economy, environment, and people | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure | |
| 2-14: Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting | a) Whether the highest governance body is responsible for reviewing and approving reported sustainability information | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure |
| b) If not, explanation of reasoning | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure | |
| 2-15: Conflicts of interest | a) How the highest governance body prevents conflicts of interest | Governance > Business Ethics > Conflicts of Interest |
| b) Whether conflicts of interest are disclosed to stakeholders | Governance > Business Ethics > Conflicts of Interest | |
| 2-16: Communication of critical concerns | a) How critical concerns are communicated to the highest governance body | Governance > Business Ethics > Communicating Critical Concerns |
| b) Number and nature of critical concerns communicated to the highest governance body | Governance > Business Ethics > Table 2.3 | |
| 2-17: Collective knowledge of the highest governance body | a) Measures taken to advance the collective knowledge, skills, and experience of the highest governance body on sustainable development | Governance > Governance Approach > Continuous Improvement |
| 2-18: Evaluation of the performance of the highest governance body | a) How the performance of the highest governance body is evaluated | Governance > Governance Approach > Continuous Improvement |
| b) Frequency of evaluations and whether they are independent | Governance > Governance Approach > Continuous Improvement | |
| c) Actions taken in response to evaluations | Governance > Governance Approach > Continuous Improvement | |
| 2-19: Remuneration policies | a) Remuneration policies for members of the highest governance body and senior executives | Management Information Circular |
| b) How these policies relate to performance and objectives related to impacts on the economy, environment, and people | Governance > Governance Approach > Structure | |
| 2-20: Process to determine remuneration | a) Process for determining remuneration and designing remuneration policies | Management Information Circular |
| b) Results of stakeholder votes on remuneration policies and proposals | Results of the Annual General and Special Meeting of Shareholders | |
| 2-21: Annual total compensation ratio | a) Ratio of annual total compensation between highest-paid individual and median for all employees | Data Tables > Workforce > Row 604 |
| b) Ratio between the percentage increase for highest-paid individual and median percentage increase for all employees | Data Tables > Workforce > Row 605 | |
| c) Necessary contextual information on data compilation | n/d | |
| 2-22: Statement on sustainable development strategy | a) Statement from the most senior executive about the relevance of and strategy for sustainable development | Home > Message from the President and CEO |
| 2-23: Policy commitments | a) Policy commitments for responsible business conduct | Governance > Business Ethics > Our Commitment |
| b) Policy commitment to respect human rights | Communities > Human Rights & Respect | |
| c) Links to policy commitments | Governance > Our Policies | |
| d) The level at which policy commitments were approved within the organization, and whether this is the most senior level | Governance > Our Policies | |
| e) The extent to which policy commitments apply to the organization’s activities and business relationships | Governance > Our Policies | |
| f) How policy commitments are communicated to workers, business partners, and other relevant parties | Governance > Our Policies | |
| 2-24: Embedding policy commitments | a) How policy commitments are embedded throughout business activities and relationships | Governance > Our Policies |
| 2-25: Process to remediate negative impacts | a) Commitments to remediate negative impacts caused or contributed to by the organization | Governance > Business Ethics > Communicating Critical Concerns |
| b) Approach to identify and address grievances | Governance > Business Ethics > Communicating Critical Concerns | |
| c) Other processes for remediating negative impacts | Governance > Business Ethics > Communicating Critical Concerns | |
| d) How intended users of the grievance mechanism are involved in its design, review, operation, and improvement | Governance > Business Ethics > Communicating Critical Concerns | |
| e) How the effectiveness of the grievance mechanism and other remediation processes is tracked | Governance > Business Ethics > Communicating Critical Concerns | |
| 2-26: Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising concerns | a) Mechanisms for individuals to seek advice on implementing responsible business conduct policies and to raise concerns | Governance > Business Ethics > Communicating Critical Concerns |
| 2-27: Compliance with laws and regulations | a) Number of fines and non-monetary sanctions for significant instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations during the reporting period | Data Tables > Governance > Rows 24-55 |
| b) Value of fines for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations in current reporting period and previous periods | Data Tables > Governance > Rows 24-56 | |
| c) Description of significant instances of non-compliance | Data Tables > Governance > Rows 24-57 | |
| d) How significant instances of non-compliance were determined | Data Tables > Governance > Rows 24-58 | |
| 2-28: Membership associations | a) Industry and other membership associations in which the organization participates | Governance > Stakeholder Management > Membership Associations |
| 2-29: Approach to stakeholder engagement | a) Description of stakeholder engagement approach | Governance > Stakeholder Management > Approach to Stakeholder Engagement |
| 2-30: Collective bargaining agreements | a) Percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements |
Our People > Employee Relations > Table 3.10 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 734-739 |
| b) For employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements, whether their working conditions and terms of employment are based on agreements that cover other employees | Our People > Employee Relations | |
| GRI 14: Mining Sector | ||
| 14.1 – GHG Emissions | ||
| 302-1: Energy consumption within the organization | a) Fuel consumption within the organization from non-renewable sources including fuel types used |
Environment > Energy > Table 5.1 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 111-118 |
| b) Fuel consumption within the organization from renewable sources including fuel types used |
Environment > Energy > Table 5.1 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 119-120 |
|
| c) Electricity, heating, cooling, and steam consumption | Data Tables > Environment > Rows 121-127 | |
| d) Electricity, heating, cooling, and steam sold | Data Tables > Environment > Rows 153-175 | |
| e) Total energy consumption within the organization |
Environment > Energy > Table 5.1 Data Tables > Environment > Row 109 |
|
| f) Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and calculation tools used | Environment > Energy > Table 5.1 | |
| g) Source of the conversion factors used | Environment > Energy > Table 5.1 | |
| 302-2: Energy consumption outside of the organization | a) Energy consumption outside of the organization | Environment > Energy > Table 5.1 |
| b) Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and calculation tools used | n/a | |
| c) Source of the conversion factors used | n/a | |
| 302-3: Energy intensity | a) Energy intensity ratio for the organization |
Environment > Energy > Table 5.2 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 131-149 |
| b) Organization-specific metric chosen to calculate the ratio |
Environment > Energy > Table 5.2 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 131-149 |
|
| c) Types of energy included in the intensity ratio; whether fuel, electricity, heating, cooling, steam, or all | Environment > Energy > Table 5.2 | |
| d) Whether the ratio uses energy consumption both within and outside of the organization | Environment > Energy > Table 5.2 | |
| 305-1: Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions | a) Gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions |
Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.7 Data Tables > Climate Change> Rows 33-72 |
| b) Gases included in the calculation; whether CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, or all |
Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.7 Data Tables > Climate Change> Rows 33-72 |
|
| c) Biogenic CO2 emissions | Data Tables > Climate Change > Rows 41, 51, 61, and 71 | |
| d) Base year for the calculation, if applicable | n/a | |
| e) Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.7 | |
| f) Consolidation approach for emissions; whether equity share, financial control, or operational control | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Scope 1 and 2 | |
| g) Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Scope 1 and 2 | |
| 305-2: Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | a) Gross location-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions |
Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.8 Data Tables > Climate Change> Rows 75-79 |
| b) If applicable, gross market-based energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | n/a | |
| c) If available, gases included in the calculation; whether CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, or all | n/d | |
| d) Base year for the calculation, if applicable | n/a | |
| e) Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.8 | |
| f) Consolidation approach for emissions; whether equity share, financial control, or operational control | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Scope 1 and 2 | |
| g) Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Scope 1 and 2 | |
| 305-3: Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | a) Gross other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions |
Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.10 Data Tables > Climate Change> Row 139 |
| b) If available, gases included in the calculation; whether CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, or all | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.10 | |
| c) Biogenic CO2 emissions | n/a | |
| d) Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions categories and activities included in the calculation |
Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.10 Data Tables > Climate Change > Rows 84-208 |
|
| e) Base year for the calculation, if applicable | n/a | |
| f) Source of the emission factors and the global warming potential (GWP) rates used | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Scope 3 | |
| g) Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Scope 3 | |
| 305-4: GHG emissions intensity | a) GHG emissions intensity ratio |
Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.9 Data Tables > Climate Change> Rows 6-28 |
| b) Organization-specific metric chosen to calculate the ratio |
Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.9 Data Tables > Climate Change> Rows 6-28 |
|
| c) Types of GHG emissions included in the ratio; whether Scope 1, Scope 2, Scope 3, or all | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.9 | |
| d) Gases included in the calculation; whether CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, or all | Climate Change > Climate Metrics & Targets > Table 7.9 | |
| 305-5: Reduction of GHG emissions | a) GHG emissions reduced as a direct result of reduction initiatives | Climate Change > Climate Strategy > Table 7.5 |
| b) Gases included in the calculation; whether CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, or all | n/d | |
| c) Base year for the calculation | n/d | |
| d) Scopes in which the reductions took place; whether Scope 1, Scope 2, Scope 3, or all | n/d | |
| e) Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | n/d | |
| 14.2 – Climate Adaptation and Resilience | ||
| 201-2: Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to climate change | a) Risks and opportunities posed by climate change that have the potential to generate substantive changes in operations, revenue, or expenditure | Climate Change > Climate Risk Management |
| 14.3 – Air Emissions | ||
| 305-7: Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions | a) Significant air emissions of NOx, SOx, persistent organic pollutants, volatile organic compounds, hazardous air pollutants and particulate matter |
Environment > Air Quality > Table 5.15 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 428-462 |
| b) Source of the emission factors used | n/d | |
| c) Standards, methodologies, assumptions, and/or calculation tools used | n/d | |
| 14.4 – Biodiversity | ||
| 101-1: Policies to halt and reverse biodiversity loss | a) Description of policies or commitments to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, and how these are informed by the 2050 Goals and 2030 Targets in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework | n/d |
| b) The extent to which these policies or commitments apply to the organization’s activities and to its business relationships | n/d | |
| c) Goals and targets to halt and reverse biodiversity loss, whether they are informed by scientific consensus, the base year, and the indicators used to evaluate progress. | n/d | |
| 101-2: Management of biodiversity impacts |
a) Description of how the mitigation hierarchy is applied, including: i. actions taken to avoid negative impacts on biodiversity; ii. actions taken to minimize negative impacts on biodiversity that were not avoided; iii. actions taken to restore and rehabilitate affected ecosystems, including the goals of the restoration and rehabilitation, and how stakeholders are engaged throughout the restoration and rehabilitation actions; iv. actions taken to offset residual negative impacts on biodiversity; v. transformative actions taken and additional conservation actions taken |
Environment > Nature > Biodiversity |
|
b) With reference to 101-2-a-iii: i. the size in hectares of the area under restoration or rehabilitation; ii. the size in hectares of the area restored or rehabilitated |
Environment > Nature > Reclamation | |
|
c) With reference to 101-2-a-iv, for each offset: i. the goals; ii. the geographic location; iii. whether and how principles of good offset practices are met; iv. whether and how the offset is certified or verified by a third party |
n/d | |
|
d) List of which sites have a biodiversity management plan and an explaination of why the other sites do not have a management plan |
Environment > Nature > Biodiversity | |
| e) How synergies are enhanced and trade-offs are reduced between actions taken to manage impacts to biodiversity and climate change | Environment > Nature > Biodiversity | |
| f) Description of how it is ensured that actions taken to manage impacts on biodiversity avoid and minimize negative impacts and maximize positive impacts for stakeholders | Environment > Nature > Biodiversity | |
| 101-4: Identification of biodiversity impacts | a) How it has determined which sites and which products and services in the supply chain have the most significant actual and potential impacts on biodiversity | Environment > Nature > Biodiversity |
| 101-5: Locations with biodiversity impacts | a) Location and size in hectares of sites with the most significant impacts on biodiversity | Environment > Nature > Table 5.14 |
|
b) For each site reported under 101-5-a, a description of whether it is in or near an ecologically sensitive area, the distance to these areas, and whether these are: i. areas of biodiversity importance; ii. areas of high ecosystem integrity; iii. areas of rapid decline in ecosystem integrity; iv. areas of high physical water risks; v. areas important for the delivery of ecosystem service benefits to Indigenous Peoples, local communities, and other stakeholders; |
Environment > Nature > Biodiversity Environment > Water > Our Commitment Communities > Rights of Indigenous Peoples |
|
| c) The activities that take place in each site reported under 101-5-a | Environment > Nature > Biodiversity | |
| d) The products and services in the supply chain with the most significant impacts on biodiversity and the countries or jurisdictions where the activities associated with these products and services take place. | n/d | |
| 101-6: Direct drivers of biodiversity loss |
a) For each site reported under 101-5-a where activities lead or could lead to land and sea use change: i. the size in hectares of natural ecosystem converted since a cut-off or reference date, the cut-off date or reference date, and the type of ecosystem before and after conversion; ii. the size in hectares of land and sea converted from one intensively used or modified ecosystem to another during the reporting period, and the type of ecosystem before and after conversion; |
Environment > Nature > Table 5.14 |
|
b) For each site reported under 101-5-a where activities lead or could lead to the exploitation of natural resources: i. for each wild species harvested, the quantity, the type, and extinction risk; ii. water withdrawal and water consumption in megaliters |
Environment > Water > Table 5.4 Environment > Water > Table 5.6 Environment > Water > Table 5.8 |
|
| c) For each site reported under 101-5-a where activities lead or could lead to pollution, a description of the quantity and the type of each pollutant generated | Environment > Air Quality > Table 5.15 | |
| d) For each site reported under 101-5-a where activities lead or could lead to the introduction of invasive alien species, describe how invasive alien species are or may be introduced | n/d | |
| e) For each product and service in the supply chain reported under 101-5-d, a country-by-country breakdown of the information required under 101-6-a, 101-6-b, 101-6-c, and 101-6-d | n/d | |
| 101-7: Changes to the state of biodiversity |
a) For affected or potentially affected ecosystems at each site reported under 101-5-a: i. the ecosystem type for the base year; ii. the ecosystem size in hectares for the base year; iii. the ecosystem condition for the base year and the current reporting period |
n/d |
| 101-8: Ecosystem services | a) For each site reported under 101-5-a, the ecosystem services and beneficiaries affected or potentially affected by the organization’s activities | n/d |
| b) How the ecosystem services and beneficiaries are or could be affected by the organization’s activities | n/d | |
| 14.5 – Waste | ||
| 306-1: Waste generation and significant waste-related impacts | a) Inputs, activities, and outputs that could lead to significant waste-related impacts, and whether these impacts stem from waste generated by the organization’s own activities, or from activities in its value chain | Environment > Waste |
| 306-2: Management of significant waste-related impacts | a) Actions taken to prevent waste generation and manage significant impacts from waste generated | Environment > Waste |
| b) If applicable, the processes used to determine whether a third party is managing waste in line with contractual and legislative obligations | Environment > Waste | |
| c) Processes used to collect and monitor waste-related data | Environment > Waste | |
| 306-3: Waste generated | a) Total weight of waste generated, by composition |
Environment > Waste > Table 5.11 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 300-423 |
| b) Contextual information necessary to understand data compilation | Environment > Waste > Table 5.11 | |
| 306-4: Waste diverted from disposal | a) Total weight of waste diverted from disposal, by composition |
Data Tables > Environment > Rows 300-423 |
| b) Weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal, broken down by recovery operation type |
Data Tables > Environment > Rows 300-423 |
|
| c) Weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal, broken down by recovery operation type |
Data Tables > Environment > Rows 300-423 |
|
| d) For each recovery operation, a breakdown of the total weight of hazardous and non hazardous waste diverted from disposal onsite and offsite |
Data Tables > Environment > Rows 300-423 |
|
| e) Contextual information necessary to understand data compilation | n/d | |
| 306-5: Waste directed to disposal | a) Total weight of waste directed to disposal, by composition |
Data Tables > Environment > Rows 300-423 |
| b) Weight of hazardous waste directed to disposal, broken down by disposal operation type |
Data Tables > Environment > Rows 300-423 |
|
| c) Weight of non-hazardous waste directed to disposal, broken down by disposal operation type |
Data Tables > Environment > Rows 300-423 |
|
| d) For each disposal operation, a breakdown of the total weight of hazardous and non hazardous waste directed to disposal onsite and offsite |
Data Tables > Environment > Rows 300-423 |
|
| e) Contextual information necessary to understand data compilation | n/d | |
| 14.7 – Water and Effluents | ||
| 303-1: Interactions with water as a shared resource | a) How the organization interacts with water, including how and where water is withdrawn, consumed, and discharged, and the water-related impacts the organization has caused or contributed to | Environment > Water |
| b) Approach used to identify water-related impacts, including the scope of assessments and their timeframe | Environment > Water | |
| c) How water-related impacts are addressed, including how the organization works with stakeholders to steward water as a shared resource, and how it engages with suppliers with significant water-related impacts | Environment > Water | |
| d) Process for setting water-related goals and targets | Environment > Water | |
| 303-2: Management of water discharge-related impacts | a) Minimum standards for the quality of effluent discharge, and how these standards were determined | Environment > Water |
| 303-3: Water withdrawal | a) Total water withdrawals by water type |
Environment > Water > Table 5.4 Environment > Water > Table 5.6 Environment > Water > Table 5.8 Environment > Water > Table 5.10 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 221-260 |
| b) Water withdrawals from areas with water stress by water type | Environment > Water | |
| c) Breakdown of total water withdrawal and withdrawal from areas of water stress by Freshwater and Other water | Data Tables > Environment > Rows 221-260 | |
| d) Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data has been compiled | Environment > Water | |
| 303-4: Water discharge | a) Total water discharge by water type |
Environment > Water > Table 5.4 Environment > Water > Table 5.6 Environment > Water > Table 5.8 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 262-297 |
| b) Breakdown of total water discharge by Freshwater and Other water | Data Tables > Environment > Rows 262-297 | |
| c) Water discharge to areas of water stress broken down by Freshwater and Other water | n/a | |
| d) Priority substances of concern for which discharges are treated, the approach for setting discharge limits, and number of incidents of non-compliance with discharge limits | Environment > Water | |
| e) Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data has been compiled | Environment > Water | |
| 303-5: Water consumption | a) Total water consumption |
Environment > Water > Table 5.3 Data Tables > Environment > Row 214 |
| b) Water consumption from areas with water stress | Environment > Water | |
| c) Change in water storage, if water storage has been identified as having a significant water-related impact | n/d | |
| d) Any contextual information necessary to understand how the data has been compiled | Environment > Water | |
| 14.8 – Closure and Rehabilitation | ||
| 402-1: Minimum notice periods regarding operational changes | a) Minimum number of weeks’ notice typically provided to employees and their representatives prior to the implementation of significant operational changes that could substantially affect them | Our People > Employee Relations |
| b) Whether the notice period and provisions for consultation and negotiation are specified in collective agreements | Our People > Employee Relations | |
| 404-2: Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs | a) Type and scope of programs implemented and assistance provided to upgrade employee skills | Our People > Workforce |
| b) Transition assistance programs provided to facilitate continued employability and the management of career endings resulting from retirement or termination of employment | n/d | |
| 14.9 – Economic Impacts | ||
| 201-1: Direct economic value generated and distributed | a) Direct economic value generated, distributed, and retained | Data Tables > Economic > Rows 5-62 |
| b) Economic values generated, distributed, and retained at country, regional, or market levels | Data Tables > Economic > Rows 5-62 | |
| 203-1: Infrastructure investments and services supported | a) Extent of development of significant infrastructure investments and services supported | n/d |
| b) Current or expected positive and negative impacts on communities and local economies |
Communities > Community Investment Communities > Housing and Land |
|
| c) Whether these investments are commercial, in-kind, or pro bono engagements | Communities > Community Investment | |
| 203-2: Significant indirect economic impacts | a) Examples of significant identified indirect economic impacts, both positive and negative | Communities > Housing and Land |
| b) Significance of the indirect economic impacts in the context of external benchmarks and stakeholder priorities | n/d | |
| 204-1: Proportion of spending on local suppliers | a) Percentage of the procurement budget used for significant locations of operations that is spent on suppliers local to that operation | Communities > Community Investment > Table 4.4 |
| b) The organization’s geographical definition of ‘local’ | Communities > Community Investment > Table 4.3 | |
| c) The definition used for ‘significant locations of operation’ | Communities > Community Investment > Table 4.4 | |
| 14.10 – Local Communities | ||
| 413-1: Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs | a) Percentage of operations with implemented local community engagement, impact assessments, and/or development programs | Communities > Human Rights & Respect > Table 4.2 |
| 413-2: Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities | a) Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities | Communities > Housing and Land |
| 14.11 – Rights of Indigenous Peoples | ||
| 411-1: Incidents of violations involving the rights of Indigenous peoples | a) Total number of identified incidents of violations involving the rights of Indigenous peoples during the reporting period |
Communities > Rights of Indigenous Peoples Data Tables > Community > Rows 225-228 |
| b) Status of the incidents and actions taken | n/a | |
| 14.14 – Security Practices | ||
| 410-1: Security personnel trained in human rights policies or procedures | a) Percentage of security personnel who have received formal training in the organization’s human rights policies or specific procedures and their application to security |
Communities > Human Rights & Respect Data Tables > Community > Rows 233-237 |
| b) Whether training requirements also apply to third-party organizations providing security personnel | Communities > Human Rights & Respect | |
| 14.15 – Critical Incident Management | ||
| 306-3: Significant spills | a) Total number and volume of recorded significant spills | Environment > Waste > Table 5.12 |
| b) For each spill, the location, volume, and material | Environment > Waste > Table 5.12 | |
| c) Impacts of significant spills | Environment > Waste > Table 5.12 | |
| 14.16 – Occupational Health and Safety | ||
| 403-1: Occupational health and safety management system | a) Statement of whether an occupational health and safety management system has been implemented, including whether it’s been implemented due to legal requirements or recognized management system standards | Our People > Health and Safety > Management Systems |
| b) The scope of workers, activities, and workplaces covered by the occupational health and safety management system | Our People > Health and Safety > Management Systems | |
| 403-2: Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation | a) Processes used to identify work-related hazards and assess risks on a routine and non-routine basis, and to apply the hierarchy of controls in order to eliminate hazards and minimize risks | Our People > Health and Safety > Risk Identification and Response |
| b) Processes for workers to report work-related hazards and hazardous situations, and an explanation of how workers are protected against reprisals | Our People > Health and Safety > Risk Identification and Response | |
| c) Policies and processes for workers to remove themselves from work situations that they believe could cause injury or ill health, and an explanation of how workers are protected against reprisals | Our People > Health and Safety > Risk Identification and Response | |
| d) Processes used to investigate work-related incidents, including the processes to identify hazards and assess risks relating to the incidents, to determine corrective actions using the hierarchy of controls, and to determine improvements needed in the occupational health and safety management system | Our People > Health and Safety > Risk Identification and Response | |
| 403-3: Occupational health services | a) The occupational health services’ functions that contribute to the identification and elimination of hazards and minimization of risks, and how the organization ensures the quality of these services and facilitates workers’ access to them | Our People > Health and Safety > Risk Identification and Response |
| 403-4: Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational health and safety | a) Processes for worker participation and consultation in the development, implementation, and evaluation of the occupational health and safety management system, and for providing access to and communicating relevant information on occupational health and safety to workers | Our People > Health and Safety > Management Systems |
| b) Where formal joint management-worker health and safety committees exist, a description of their responsibilities, meeting frequency, decision-making authority, and whether any workers are not represented by these committees | Our People > Health and Safety > Management Systems | |
| 403-5: Worker training on occupational health and safety | a) Occupational health and safety training provided to workers, including generic training as well as training on specific work-related hazards, hazardous activities, or hazardous situations | Our People > Health and Safety > Training |
| 403-6: Promotion of worker health | a) How the organization facilitates workers’ access to non-occupational medical and healthcare services, and the scope of access provided | Our People > Health and Safety > Training |
| b) Voluntary health promotion services and programs offered to workers to address major non-work-related health risks, including the specific health risks addressed, and how the organization facilitates workers’ access to these services and programs | Our People > Health and Safety > Training | |
| 403-7: Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships | a) Approach to preventing or mitigating significant negative occupational health and safety impacts that are directly linked to its operations, products or services by its business relationships, and the related hazards and risks | Our People > Health and Safety > Risk Identification and Response |
| 403-8: Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system | a) The number and percentage of employees and workers who are not employees who are covered by an occupational health and safety management system, and the number and percentage of those who are covered by audited systems, separated by internally and externally audited |
Our People > Health and Safety > Management Systems > Table 3.4 Data Tables > Health & Safety > Rows 229-246 |
| b) Whether any workers have been excluded from this disclosure and why | Our People > Health and Safety > Management Systems | |
| c) Necessary contextual information on data compilation | Our People > Health and Safety > Management Systems | |
| 403-9: Work-related injuries | a) Work-related injury statistics for employees |
Our People > Health and Safety > Performance > Table 3.6 Data Tables > Health & Safety > Rows 5-178 |
| b) Work-related injury statistic for workers who are not employees |
Our People > Health and Safety > Performance > Table 3.6 Data Tables > Health & Safety > Rows 5-178 |
|
| c) Work-related hazards that pose a risk of high-consequence injury | Our People > Health and Safety > Risk Identification and Response | |
| d) Actions taken or underway to eliminate other work-related hazards and minimize risks using the hierarchy of controls | Our People > Health and Safety > Risk Identification and Response | |
| e) Whether the rates have been calculated based on 200,000 or 1,000,000 hours worked |
Our People > Health and Safety > Performance > Table 3.6 Data Tables > Health & Safety > Rows 5-178 |
|
| f) Whether any workers have been excluded from this disclosure and why | n/d | |
| g) Necessary contextual information on data compilation | n/d | |
| 403-10: Work-related ill health | a) Work-related ill health statistics for employees |
Data Tables > Health & Safety > Rows 186-206 |
| b) Work-related ill health statistics for workers who are not employees |
Data Tables > Health & Safety > Rows 182-206 |
|
| c) Work-related hazards that pose a risk of ill health | Our People > Health and Safety > Risk Identification and Response | |
| d) Whether any workers have been excluded from this disclosure and why | n/d | |
| e) Necessary contextual information on data compilation | n/d | |
| 14.17 – Employment Practices | ||
| 202-1: Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage | a) Ratio of entry level wage by gender to the local minimum wage for employees | Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 557-599 |
| b) Actions taken to determine whether workers who are not employees are paid above the minimum wage | n/d | |
| c) Whether a local minimum wage is absent or variable at significant locations of operation, by gender | Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 557-599 | |
| d) The definition used for ‘significant locations of operation’ | Home > The Company | |
| 401-1: New employee hires and employee turnover | a) Total number and rate of new employee hires during the reporting period, by age group, gender, and region |
Our People > Workforce > Table 3.3 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 181-272 |
| b) Total number and rate of employee turnover during the reporting period by age group, gender, and region |
Our People > Workforce > Table 3.3 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 276-553 |
|
| 401-2: Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees | a) Benefits which are standard for full-time employees but are not provided to temporary or part-time employees, by significant locations of operation | n/d |
| b) The definition used for ‘significant locations of operation’ | Home > The Company | |
| 401-3: Parental leave | a) Total number of employees that were entitled to parental leave, by gender |
Our People > Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility > Table 3.9 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 609-615 |
| b) Number of employees that took parental leave, by gender |
Our People > Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility > Table 3.9 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 618-640 |
|
| c) Number of employees that returned to work in the reporting period after parental leave ended, by gender |
Our People > Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility > Table 3.9 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 643-665 |
|
| d) Total number of employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work, by gender |
Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 693-707 |
|
| e) Return to work retention rates of employees that took parental leave, by gender |
Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 710-724 |
|
| 402-1: Minimum notice periods regarding operational changes | a) Minimum number of weeks’ notice typically provided to employees and their representatives prior to the implementation of significant operational changes that could substantially affect them | Our People > Employee Relations |
| b) Whether the notice period and provisions for consultation and negotiation are specified in collective agreements | Our People > Employee Relations | |
| 404-1: Average hours of training per year per employee | a) Average hours of training that the organization’s employees have undertaken during the reporting period, by gender and employee category | Our People > Workforce |
| 404-2: Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs | a) Type and scope of programs implemented and assistance provided to upgrade employee skills | Our People > Workforce |
| b) Transition assistance programs provided to facilitate continued employability and the management of career endings resulting from retirement or termination of employment | n/d | |
| 414-1: New suppliers that were screened using social criteria | a) Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria | n/d |
| 414-2: Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | a) Number of suppliers assessed for social impacts | Data Tables > Community > Rows 241-266 |
| b) Number of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts | Data Tables > Community > Rows 241-266 | |
| c) Significant actual and potential social impacts identified in the supply chain | n/d | |
| d) Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which improvements were agreed upon as a result of assessment | n/d | |
| e) Percentage of suppliers identified as having significant actual and potential negative social impacts with which relationships were terminated as a result of assessment | n/d | |
| 14.18 – Child Labor | ||
| 408-1: Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labor | a) Operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor and young workers exposed to hazardous work | Our People > Employee Relations |
| b) Operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of child labor broken down by type of operation and supplier, and countries or geographic areas with operations and suppliers considered at risk | n/a | |
| c) Measures taken intended to contribute to the effective abolition of child labor | Our People > Employee Relations | |
| 414-1: New suppliers that were screened using social criteria | a) Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria | n/d |
| 14.19 – Forced Labour and Modern Slavery | ||
| 409-1: Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor | a) Operations and suppliers considered to have significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor broken down by type of operation and supplier, and countries or geographic areas with operations and suppliers considered at risk | Our People > Employee Relations |
| b) Measures taken intended to contribute to the elimination of forced or compulsory labor | Our People > Employee Relations | |
| 414-1: New suppliers that were screened using social criteria | a) Percentage of new suppliers that were screened using social criteria | n/d |
| 14.20 – Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining | ||
| 407-1: Operations and suppliers in which the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining may be at risk | a) Operations and suppliers in which workers’ rights to exercise freedom of association or collective bargaining may be violated or at significant risk | Our People > Employee Relations |
| b) Measures taken intended to support rights to exercise freedom of association and collective bargaining | Our People > Employee Relations | |
| 14.21 – Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity | ||
| 202-2: Proportion of senior management hired from the local community | a) Percentage of senior management at significant locations of operation that are hired from the local community |
Communities > Community Investment > Table 4.3 Data Tables > Community > Rows 70-76 |
| b) The definition used for ‘senior management’ | Communities > Community Investment > Table 4.3 | |
| c) The organization’s geographical definition of ‘local’ | Communities > Community Investment > Table 4.3 | |
| d) The definition used for ‘significant locations of operation’ | Communities > Community Investment > Table 4.3 | |
| 401-3: Parental leave | a) Total number of employees that were entitled to parental leave, by gender |
Our People > Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility > Table 3.9 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 609-615 |
| b) Number of employees that took parental leave, by gender |
Our People > Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility > Table 3.9 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 618-640 |
|
| c) Number of employees that returned to work in the reporting period after parental leave ended, by gender |
Our People > Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility > Table 3.9 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 643-665 |
|
| d) Total number of employees that returned to work after parental leave ended that were still employed 12 months after their return to work, by gender |
Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 693-707 |
|
| e) Return to work retention rates of employees that took parental leave, by gender |
Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 710-724 |
|
| 404-1: Average hours of training per year per employee | a) Average hours of training that the organization’s employees have undertaken during the reporting period, by gender and employee category | Our People > Workforce |
| 405-1: Diversity of governance bodies and employees | a) Percentage of individuals within the organization’s governance bodies of each gender, age group, and other indicators of diversity |
Governance > Governance Approach > Table 2.1 Data Tables > Governance > Rows 6-12 |
| b) Percentage of employees per employee category of each gender, age group, and other indicators of diversity |
Our People > Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility > Table 3.7 Our People > Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility > Figures 3.1-3.6 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 42-151 |
|
| 405-2: Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men | a) Ratio of the basic salary and remuneration of women to men for each employee category, by significant locations of operation | Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 557-577 |
| b) Definition used for ‘significant locations of operation’ | Home > The Company | |
| 406-1: Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken | a) Total number of incidents of discrimination during the reporting period |
Our People > Inclusion, Diversity, Equity & Accessibility Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 750-756 |
| b) Status of the incidents and actions taken | n/a | |
| 14.22 – Anti-Corruption | ||
| 205-1: Operations assessed for risks related to corruption | a) Total number and percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption | Governance > Business Ethics > Anti-Bribery & Corruption |
| b) Significant risks related to corruption identified through the risk assessment | Governance > Business Ethics > Anti-Bribery & Corruption | |
| 205-2: Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures | a) Total number and percentage of governance body members that the organization’s anti-corruption policies have been communicated to |
Governance > Anti-Bribery & Corruption > Table 2.2 Data Tables > Governance > Rows 95-96 |
| b) Total number and percentage of employees that the organization’s anti-corruption policies have been communicated to |
Governance > Anti-Bribery & Corruption > Table 2.2 Data Tables > Governance > Rows 60-98 |
|
| c) Total number and percentage of business partners that the organization’s anti-corruption policies have been communicated to |
Governance > Anti-Bribery & Corruption > Table 2.2 Data Tables > Governance > Rows 60-98 |
|
| d) Total number and percentage of governance body members that have received training on anti-corruption | Data Tables > Governance > Rows 97-98 | |
| e) Total number and percentage of employees that have received training on anti-corruption | Data Tables > Governance > Rows 93-94 | |
| 205-3: Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken | a) Total number and nature of confirmed incidents of corruption |
Governance > Anti-Bribery & Corruption Data Tables > Governance > Rows 123-128 |
| b) Total number of confirmed incidents in which employees were dismissed or disciplined for corruption |
Governance > Anti-Bribery & Corruption Data Tables > Governance > Row 125 |
|
| c) Total number of confirmed incidents when contracts with business partners were terminated due to violations related to corruption |
Governance > Anti-Bribery & Corruption Data Tables > Governance > Row 126 |
|
| d) Public legal cases regarding corruption brought against the organization or its employees |
Governance > Anti-Bribery & Corruption Data Tables > Governance > Row 127 |
|
| 14.23 – Payments to Governments | ||
| 201-1: Direct economic value generated and distributed | a) Direct economic value generated, distributed, and retained | Data Tables > Economic > Rows 5-62 |
| b) Economic values generated, distributed, and retained at country, regional, or market levels | Data Tables > Economic > Rows 5-62 | |
| 201-4: Financial assistance received from government | a) Monetary value of financial assistance received from any government | Data Tables > Economic > Rows 125-195 |
| b) The information in 201-4-a by country | Data Tables > Economic > Rows 196-197 | |
| c) Whether any government is present in the shareholding structure | Data Tables > Economic > Row 195 | |
| 207-1: Approach to tax | a) Description of the approach to tax | n/d |
| 207-2: Tax governance, control, and risk management | a) Description of the tax governance and control framework | n/d |
| b) Description of the assurance process for disclosures on tax | n/d | |
| 207-3: Stakeholder engagement and management of concerns related to tax | a) A description of the approach to stakeholder engagement and management of stakeholder concerns related to tax | n/d |
| 207-4: Country-by-country reporting | a) All tax jurisdictions where the entities included in consolidated financial statements are resident for tax purposes |
Data Tables > Economic > Rows 280-300 |
| b) Details on entities in each tax jurisdiction |
Data Tables > Economic > Rows 280-300 |
|
| c) The time period covered for reported tax information |
Data Tables > Economic > Rows 280-300 |
|
| 14.24 – Public Policy | ||
| 415-1: Political contributions | a) Total monetary value of financial and in-kind political contributions made directly and indirectly by the organization by country and recipient/beneficiary | Data Tables > Economic > Rows 201-215 |
| b) If applicable, how the monetary value of in-kind contributions was estimated | n/a | |
SASB Index
| SASB Indicator | Response | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse Gas Emissions | ||
| EM-MM-110a.1: Gross global Scope 1 emissions, percentage covered under emissions-limiting regulations | 198,315 tCO2e, 100% |
Climate Change > Climate Metrics and Targets > Scope 1 and 2 Data Tables > Climate Change > Row 64 |
| EM-MM-110a.2: Discussion of long-term and short-term strategy or plan to manage Scope 1 emissions, emissions reduction targets, and an analysis of performance against those targets | Climate Change > Climate Strategy | |
| Air Quality | ||
| EM-MM-120a.1: Air emissions of the following pollutants: (1) CO, (2) NOx (excluding N2O), (3) SOx, (4) particulate matter (PM10), (5) mercury (Hg), (6) lead (Pb), and (7) volatile organic compounds (VOCs) | (1) 557.1 t (2) 860.0 t (3) 2.6 t (4) 320.1 t (5) 0.0 t (6) 0.0 t (7) 37.3 t |
Environment > Air Quality > Table 5.15 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 428-462 |
| Energy Management | ||
| EM-MM-130a.1: (1) Total energy consumed, (2) percentage grid electricity, (3) percentage renewable | (1) 4,609,093 GJ (2) 34% (3) 0% |
Environment > Energy > Table 5.1 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 109-127 |
| Water Management | ||
| EM-MM-140a.1: (1) Total fresh water withdrawn, (2) total fresh water consumed, percentage of each in regions with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress | (1) 13,520 ML, 0% (2) 6,705 ML, 0% |
Environment > Water > Our Commitment > Table 5.3 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 211 and 214 |
| EM-MM-140a.2: Number of incidents of non-compliance associated with water quality permits, standards, and regulations | 1 | Environment > Water > Island Gold District |
| Waste & Hazardous Materials Management | ||
| EM-MM-150a.4: Total weight of non-mineral waste generated | 28,224 t |
Environment > Waste > Table 5.11 Data Tables > Environment > Row 333 |
| EM-MM-150a.5: Total weight of tailings produced | 6,052,452 t |
Environment > Waste > Table 5.11 Data Tables > Environment > Row 411 |
| EM-MM-150a.6: Total weight of waste rock generated | 30,159,402 t | Data Tables > Production > Row 44 |
| EM-MM-150a.7: Total weight of hazardous waste generated | 18,285,305 t | Data Tables > Environment > Rows 337 and 409 |
| EM-MM-150a.8: Total weight of hazardous waste recycled | 1,563,990 t |
Environment > Waste > Table 5.11 Data Tables > Environment > Rows 339 and 421 |
| EM-MM-150a.9: Number of significant incidents associated with hazardous materials and waste management | 12 | Environment > Waste > Table 5.12 |
| EM-MM-150a.10: Description of waste and hazardous materials management policies and procedures for active and inactive operations | Environment > Waste | |
| Biodiversity Impacts | ||
| EM-MM-160a.1: Description of environmental management policies and practices for active sites | Environment > Nature | |
| EM-MM-160a.2: Percentage of mine sites where acid rock drainage is: (1) predicted to occur, (2) actively mitigated, and (3) under treatment or remediation | (1) 66% (2) 66% (3) 33% | Environment > Water > Table 5.10 |
| EM-MM-160a.3: Percentage of (1) proven and (2) probable reserves in or near sites with protected conservation status or endangered species habitat | (1) 100% (2) 100% |
Environment > Nature > Biodiversity Data Tables > Environment > Rows 519-587 |
| Security, Human Rights, & Rights of Indigenous Peoples | ||
| EM-MM-210a.1: Percentage of (1) proved and (2) probable reserves in or near areas of conflict | (1) Gold: 3%, Silver: 10% (2) Gold: 13%, Silver: 25% | Data Tables > Community > Rows 152-220 |
| EM-MM-210a.2: Percentage of (1) proved and (2) probable reserves in or near Indigenous land | (1) Gold: 95%, Silver: 73% (2) Gold: 67%, Silver: 10% | Data Tables > Community > Rows 80-148 |
| EM-MM-210a.3: Discussion of engagement processes and due diligence practices with respect to human rights, Indigenous rights, and operation in areas of conflict | Communities > Human Rights & Respect | |
| Community Relations | ||
| EM-MM-210b.1: Discussion of process to manage risks and opportunities associated with community rights and interests | Communities > Human Rights & Respect | |
| EM-MM-210b.2: Number and duration of non-technical delays | 0 | Communities > Human Rights & Respect |
| Labor Relations | ||
| EM-MM-310a.1: Percentage of active workforce covered under collective bargaining agreements, broken down by U.S. and foreign employees |
Our People > Employee Relations > Table 3.10 Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 735-739 |
|
| EM-MM-310a.2: Number and duration of strikes and lockouts | 0 |
Our People > Employee Relations Data Tables > Workforce > Rows 742-746 |
| Workforce Health & Safety | ||
| EM-MM-320a.1: (1) fatality rate, (2) near miss frequency rate (NMFR) and (3) average hours of health, safety, and emergency response training for (a) full-time employees and (b) contract employees | (1a) 0.00 (1b) 0.00 (2a) 6.72 (2b) 2.73 (3) 19.59 for entire workforce |
Our People > Health & Safety > Table 3.5 Our People > Health & Safety > Table 3.6 Data Tables > Health & Safety |
| Business Ethics & Transparency | ||
| EM-MM-510a.1: Description of the management system for prevention of corruption and bribery throughout the value chain | Governance > Business Ethics > Anti-Bribery & Corruption | |
| EM-MM-510a.2: Production in countries that have the 20 lowest rankings in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index | 0 | Governance > Business Ethics > Anti-Bribery & Corruption |
| Tailings Storage Facility Management | ||
| EM-MM-540a.1: Tailings storage facility inventory table: (1) facility name, (2) location, (3) ownership status, (4) operational status, (5) construction method, (6) maximum permitted storage capacity, (7) current amount of tailings stored, (8) consequence classification, (9) date of most recent independent technical review, (10) material findings, (11) mitigation measures, (12) site-specific EPRP | Tailings > Tailings Facilities > Tailings Table Download | |
| EM-MM-540a.2: Summary of tailings management systems and governance structure used to monitor and maintain the stability of tailings storage facilities |
Tailings > Tailings Governance Tailings > Tailings Management |
|
| EM-MM-540a.3: Approach to development of Emergency Preparedness and Response Plans (EPRPs) for tailings storage facilities | Tailings > Tailings Management | |
TCFD Index
| Disclosure Title | TCFD Recommended Disclosure | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Governance | Describe the board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities | Climate Governance |
| Governance | Describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities | Climate Governance |
| Strategy | Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short, medium, and long term |
Climate Risk Management > Physical Risks > Table 7.1 Climate Risk Management > Transition Risks > Table 7.2 Climate Strategy > Table 7.5 |
| Strategy | Describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario | Climate Risk Management > Climate Risk Mitigation & Resilience > Table 7.3 |
| Strategy | Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning | Climate Risk Management > Climate Risk Mitigation & Resilience |
| Risk Management | Describe the organisation’s process for identifying and assessing climate-related risks | Climate Risk Management > Risk Assessment Methodology |
| Risk Management | Describe the organisation’s processes for managing climate-related risks | Climate Risk Management > Climate Risk Mitigation & Resilience |
| Risk Management | Describe how processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organisation’s overall risk management | Climate Risk Management > Risk Assessment Methodology |
| Metrics and Targets | Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process | Climate Metrics & Targets > Scope 1 and 2 |
| Metrics and Targets | Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the related risks |
Climate Metrics & Targets > Scope 1 and 2 Climate Metrics & Targets > Scope 3 |
| Metrics and Targets | Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets. |
Climate Metrics & Targets > Targets Climate Strategy |
Cautionary Statements
The TSX and NYSE have not reviewed and do not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this report. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.
This report contains or incorporates by reference “forward-looking statements” and “forward-looking information” as defined under applicable Canadian and U.S. securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical fact, which address events, results, outcomes or developments that the Company expects to occur are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “expect”, “intend”, “estimate”, “potential”, “outlook”, “target”, “aim”, “strive”, “on track”, “continue”, “ongoing”, “objective”, “goal”, “working toward”, “plan”, “future” or variations of such words and phrases and similar expressions or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved or the negative connotation of such terms.
Forward-looking statements in this report include, but may not be limited to, information as to strategy, plans, expectations or future financial or operating performance, such as: the Company’s sustainability strategy; environmental and workplace health and safety programs; corporate social responsibility; governance; finalizing and publishing an Indigenous Peoples Policy and the Company’s Reconciliation Action Plan; community development initiatives; climate-related strategy, risks, opportunities, and targets; emissions reduction; cyanide code adoption; water management; tailings management; conformance with sustainability standards; exploration outlook; mine life; mineral reserves and resources; forecast gold production; gold grades; recoveries; waste-to-ore ratios; costs; effects of completion of the Phase 3+ expansion project at the Island Gold mine; integration of the Island Gold and Magino operations; development of a 115kV powerline for the Island Gold District; opportunities presented by the Lynn Lake project; continued Company growth; long-term value for stakeholders; and future plans and objectives based on forecasts of future operational or financial results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this report, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, technical, legal, political and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information.
Such factors include (without limitation): the actual results of current exploration activities; changes to current estimates of mineral reserves and resources; conclusions of economic and geological evaluations; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; changes to production estimates (which assume accuracy of projected ore grade, mining rates, recovery timing and recovery rate estimates and may be impacted by unscheduled maintenance; weather issues, labour and contractor availability and other operating or technical difficulties); operations may be exposed to illnesses, diseases, epidemics and/or pandemics which could have an impact on the broader market and the trading price of the Company’s shares; governmental orders or mandates (including with respect to mining operations generally or auxiliary businesses or services required for the Company’s operations) in Canada, Mexico, the United States, or any other jurisdiction in which the Company may conduct business; the duration of regulatory responses to any illness, disease, epidemic and/or pandemic; government and the Company’s attempts to reduce the spread of any illness, disease, epidemic and/or pandemic which may affect many aspects of the Company’s operations including the ability to transport personnel to and from site, contractor and supply availability and the ability to sell or deliver gold doré bars; fluctuations in the price of gold or certain other commodities such as, diesel fuel, natural gas, and electricity; changes in foreign exchange rates (particularly the Canadian Dollar, Mexican Peso, and U.S. Dollar and); the impact of inflation and any tariffs, trade barriers and/or regulatory costs; changes in the Company’s credit rating; any decision to declare a quarterly dividend; employee and community relations; the impact of litigation and administrative proceedings and any resulting court, arbitral and/or administrative decisions; disruptions affecting operations; availability of, and increased costs associated with, mining inputs and labour; delays with: the Phase 3+ expansion project at the Island Gold mine, the development of the 115kV powerline, or construction of the Lynn Lake Project; the risk that the Company’s mines may not perform as planned; uncertainty with the Company’s ability to secure additional capital to execute its business plans; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining necessary licenses and permits, including the necessary licenses, permits, authorizations and/or approvals from the appropriate regulatory authorities for the Company’s development stage and operating assets; labour and contractor availability (and being able to secure the same on favourable terms); indigenous title claims, rights to consultation/accommodation, and the Company’s relationship with local communities may affect the Company’s existing operations and development projects; contests over title to properties; expropriation or nationalization of property; inherent risks and hazards associated with mining and mineral processing including industrial accidents; environmental hazards including, without limitation, fires, floods, seismic activity, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures and cave-ins; changes in national and local government legislation, controls or regulations in Canada, Mexico, the United States and other jurisdictions in which the Company does or may carry on business in the future; increased costs and risks, including physical and operational risks, related to the potential impact of climate change and other climate-related risks such as warm spells, cold spells, heavy precipitation, storms, wildfires, floods, drought, which may have an effect on mine permitting, operations, ore extraction, mine closure or impact on employee safety and the local environment; problems with water sources could have a negative impact on the Company’s exploration programs and future operations; the Company’s activities are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase its costs of doing business and restrict its operations; failure to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; disruptions in the maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information technology systems; risk of loss due to sabotage, protests and other civil disturbances; the costs and timing of construction and development of new deposits; risks associated with the start-up of new mines; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; and business opportunities that may be pursued by the Company.
Additional risk factors and details with respect to risk factors that may affect the Company’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this report are set out in the Company’s latest 40-F/Annual Information Form and Management’s Discussion and Analysis each under the heading “Risk Factors”, available on the SEDAR+ website at www.sedarplus.ca or on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. The foregoing should be reviewed in conjunction with the information, risk factors and assumptions found in this report.
The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Note to U.S. Investors
All resource and reserve estimates included in this report or documents referenced in this report have been prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) – CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, as amended (the “CIM Standards”). NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators, which established standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. Mining disclosure in the United States was previously required to comply with SEC Industry Guide 7 (“SEC Industry Guide 7”) under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has adopted final rules, to replace SEC Industry Guide 7 with new mining disclosure rules under sub-part 1300 of Regulation S-K of the U.S. Securities Act (“Regulation S-K 1300”) which became mandatory for U.S. reporting companies beginning with the first fiscal year commencing on or after January 1, 2021. Under Regulation S-K 1300, the SEC now recognizes estimates of “Measured Mineral Resources”, “Indicated Mineral Resources” and “Inferred Mineral Resources”. In addition, the SEC has amended its definitions of “Proven Mineral Reserves” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” to be substantially similar to international standards.
Investors are cautioned that while the above terms are “substantially similar” to CIM Definitions, there are differences in the definitions under Regulation S-K 1300 and the CIM Standards. Accordingly, there is no assurance any mineral reserves or mineral resources that the Company may report as “proven mineral reserves”, “probable mineral reserves”, “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” under NI 43-101 would be the same had the Company prepared the mineral reserve or mineral resource estimates under the standards adopted under Regulation S-K 1300. U.S. investors are also cautioned that while the SEC recognizes “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” under Regulation S-K 1300, investors should not assume that any part or all of the mineralization in these categories will ever be converted into a higher category of mineral resources or into mineral reserves. Mineralization described using these terms has a greater degree of uncertainty as to its existence and feasibility than mineralization that has been characterized as reserves. Accordingly, investors are cautioned not to assume that any measured mineral resources, indicated mineral resources, or inferred mineral resources that the Company reports are or will be economically or legally mineable.
Qualified Persons
Chris Bostwick, FAusIMM, Alamos’ Senior Vice President, Technical Services, who is a “Qualified Person” within the meaning of NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information contained in this report.